GROUP SITES
 
  The Indian Express
  The Financial Express
  Latest News
  Screen
  Kashmir Live
  Loksatta
  COLUMNISTS
 
  The Indian Express
  The Financial Express
  CITY NEWSLINES
 
 
  SERVICES
 
  MONEY Transfer-
Safe & Easy
  PHONECARDS
for India
 
  Send GIFTS
to India
 

Matrimonial

  COMMUNITY
 
  Message Board
  SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
  Free Newsletter
  Express North
American Edition
  BIZ PUBLICATIONS
 
  Express Computer
  Network Magazine
  Express Hotelier & Caterer
  Express Travel & Tourism
  Express Business Traveller
  Express Pharma Pulse
  Express Healthcare Management
  Express Textile
  Express IT People
 

 
 
 
Indo-Pak Face Off
 

Pak had plans to nuke India in 1999

Press Trust of India

London, May 12: The Pakistani army mobilised its nuclear arsenal against India in 1999 - during the Kargil conflictwithout the knowledge of its prime minister Nawaz Sharif, The Sunday Times reported quoting a senior White House adviser at that time.

In a paper to be published shortly by the university of Pennsylvania, Bruce Riedel, who was a senior adviser to then US president Bill Clinton on India and Pakistan, recalls how the president was told that he faced the most important foreign policy meeting of his career.

"There was disturbing information about Pakistan preparing its nuclear arsenal," Riedel writes. According to the report, Riedel and other aides feared that India and Pakistan were heading for a "deadly descent into full-scale conflict, with a danger of nuclear cataclysm".

They were also concerned about Osama bin Laden's growing influence in the region. Intelligence experts had told Riedel that the flight times of missiles fired by either side would be as little as three minutes and that "a Pakistani strike on just one Indian city, Mumbai, would kill between 150,000 and 850,000 alone".

Riedel, the newspaper said, told Clinton not to reveal his intelligence hand in the opening talks with Sharif, in which the president handed the premier a cartoon that showed Pakistan and India firing nuclear missiles at one another.

But in a second discussion, at which Riedel was the only other person present, "Clinton asked Sharif if he knew how advanced the threat of nuclear war really was. Did Sharif know his military was preparing their missiles?" he writes.

While Clinton reminded Sharif how close the US and Soviet Union had come to nuclear war in 1962 over Cuba, Sharif agreed it would be a catastrophe even if a single bomb was dropped. Riedel does not state in the paper how the Americans gathered their intelligence, nor what the mobilisation entailed. But John Pike, director of the Washington-based Global Security Oganisation, said intelligence channels could have become aware of the trucks that carry Pakistan's nuclear missiles being moved from their bases at Sargodha, near Rawalpindi.

"One scenario is that missile trucks were picked up parked in a convoy," he said.

Clinton drove home the advantage that the intelligence coup had given him, Riedel recalls. "Did Sharif order the Pakistani nuclear missile force to prepare for action," the prime minister was asked. "Did he realise how crazy that was?"

Riedel describes how an "exhausted" Sharif "denied he had ordered the preparation and said he was against that, but worried for his life back in Pakistan".

Soon afterwards Sharif, who now lives in exile in Saudi Arabia, signed a document agreeing to pull back his forces from Kargil. If, as Riedel implies, Sharif was kept in the dark about this nuclear programme, he suffered a similar embarrassment to that of his predecessor, Benazir Bhutto, who is said to have asked the CIA for a briefing on Islamabad's nuclear capability because that privilege was denied to her by her own generals.

According to the newspaper, a recent report by the CIAGlobal Trends 2015predicts that the threat of nuclear war will remain a serious regional issue for the next 15 years. By next year Pakistan is thought likely to have between 50 and 75 nuclear warheads, while India will have between 75 and 100, the report said.

 

 
Write to the Editor
Mail this Story
Print this Story
 
Search News
 
 
  More Indo-Pak Face Off Headlines
Pak unwilling to give up terror agenda: India
Pak says it wants de-escalation along border
Rocca to meet Pak leaders on Wednesday
   
 
British Indian journo held in Pakistan
Pak unwilling to give up terror agenda: India
Pak worried as top Afghan contracts go to India
US considers India more reliable than Pak
India preparing for 'limited assault' on Pak: ISI
Soccer World Cup 2002
India-Windies Series
Ayodhya Temple Turmoil
Union Budget 2002
Gujarat Riots
India-Pak Face Off
Kashmir Monitor