New York Times Opinion
The New York Times
Home
Find a Job
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Nation Challenged
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Winter Olympics
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
- Columns
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Photos
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Help Center
NYT Mobile
NYT Store
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Newspaper
  Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Your Profile
Review Profile
E-Mail Options
Log Out
Text Version
search Welcome, boyandob  
Sign Up for Newsletters  |  Log Out
  
Go to Advanced Search
E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles

 

January 27, 2002

Indian Point Reactor

Related Articles
Nuclear Reactors as Terrorist Targets (January 21, 2002)

To the Editor:

Re "Nuclear Reactors as Terrorist Targets" (editorial, Jan. 21):

You acknowledge that nuclear plants were not designed to withstand Sept. 11-type attacks, but call the movement to shut down the Indian Point reactor pending security upgrades "an overreaction." This is inconsistent.

Although Indian Point's owner asserts that its 3.5-foot-thick concrete containment domes could survive a jumbo jet attack, the engines could penetrate up to six feet of reinforced concrete. The test you cite of a much smaller aircraft that did not damage a concrete wall on impact proves nothing, since the wall was not attached to the ground and was displaced nearly six feet. The test report said "the major portion of the impact energy went into movement of the target and not in producing structural damage."

You also did not note the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's recent confirmation that 46 percent of nuclear plants have exhibited security weaknesses that could have enabled terrorists to gain access and cause a meltdown.  
EDWIN S. LYMAN
Scientific Director
Nuclear Control Institute
Washington, Jan. 24, 2002



Home | Back to Opinion | Search | Help Back to Top


E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles


Advertiser Links

Discover New
Topics of the Times




Search our job listings for the best opportunities or post your resume to attract top employers.


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Information