
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Steven Dolley
Tuesday,
February 8, 2000
202-822-8444
U.S.-RUSSIAN
DEAL TO HALT REPROCESSING:
OVERDUE
AND UNDERACHIEVING
(Revised
to reflect DOE Fact Sheet)
The
Nuclear Control Institute today issued the following statement by NCI President
Paul Leventhal on the U.S.-Russian collaboration to halt reprocessing of civilian
nuclear fuel in Russia, which was announced by Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson
on February 7:
Russia's
apparent agreement to stop extracting plutonium from the fuel of its civilian
nuclear power reactors is a major achievement for U.S. negotiators and mirrors
what the United States decided to do with its own civilian spent nuclear fuel
nearly 25 years ago. It is high
time the Russians caught on, and their decision is a clear vindication of U.S.
non-proliferation, anti-plutonium policies.
The
United States now should follow up with a long overdue U.S. initiative to win
a halt by the major plutonium producers---Britain, France, Germany and Japan---as
well. Regrettably, the Department
of Energy promptly announced that the U.S.-Russian initiative "is focused
exclusively on Russia and is not intended to address civilian fuel cycle activities
elsewhere....specifically...the use of plutonium in civilian nuclear programs
in Western Europe and Japan."
Unless
our European and Japanese allies join in a moratorium on extracting plutonium
and using it as fuel, the U.S.-Russian plutonium initiative will have only limited
impact. There will be some security
benefit in Russia, but worldwide production of atom bomb material from civilian
electricity-generating reactors will continue to grow.
Spent fuel reprocessing in Europe and Japan has already produced more
weapons-usable plutonium in civilian programs than the United States and Russia
have produced for weapons.
Proliferating
states like North Korea, Iraq, Iran, India and Pakistan point to these programs
to justify their own acquisition of plutonium.
Most of India's military plutonium, including the plutonium used in its
1974 and 1998 test explosions, was produced originally in civilian reactors.
Another
big problem with the U.S.-Russian deal is that it is silent on current plans
by both superpowers to use most of their surplus military plutonium from retired
warheads as fuel in civilian nuclear power reactors. U.S. and Russian plans to introduce warhead plutonium into
civilian reactors provide further encouragement for plutonium production and
use in Europe and Japan and in the proliferating states.
A
further problem is that while the Russians may now be willing to store their
30 tons of already reprocessed, civilian plutonium, they want to save it for a generation of so-called `proliferation-resistant'
reactors, not yet developed, rather than dispose of it with highly radioactive
waste and get it out of harm's way.
It
is still unclear what kind of research the United States is offering to sponsor
in Russia as an inducement to halt further reprocessing of civilian nuclear
fuel. Based on clearly stated Russian preferences, it could even include developing
new plutonium-fueled, breeder-type reactors and designing a new generation of
facilities for reprocessing the spent fuel Russia now seems willing to store
for the time being.
This
kind of deal does not put an end to plutonium use; it simply puts it off to
another day.
The
U.S.-Russian initiative on civilian reprocessing could be a major step forward,
but without a similar move by the Europeans and Japanese,
and without a moratorium on use of warhead and civilian plutonium as
fuel, this initiative could prove to be a lot less than meets the eye.
NCI
For
more information on plutonium and reprocessing issues, visit the NCI website
at http://www.nci.org; also, a separate section on U.S.-Russian disposition
of military plutonium at www.nci.org/nci-wpu.htm
What's New
Weapons Plutonium Page
Home
Page